COAI paper renews call for OTTs to share infrastructure costs

COAI paper renews call for OTTs to share infrastructure costs

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has issued a new white paper calling on OTT players who generate huge amounts of traffic to share network upgrade costs with Indian telcos to make the telecoms industry more sustainable.

According to media reports, the paper looks at capex and data traffic in India between 2014 and 2023 to demonstrate the impact of LTG traffic on networks. The paper also analyses five possible models for resolving the problem, but ultimately concludes that the most sustainable model is one where OTT players share infrastructure costs.

The paper also cites a study conducted by Analysys Mason (and commissioned by COAI) which estimates Indian telcos will spend up to $75 billion on 5G networks alone until 2035.


COAI director general Lt. Gen. Dr. S P Kochhar said in a statement that OTT players – described in the paper as large traffic generators (LTGs) – pay no direct fees for using telecoms infrastructure whilst eating up a considerable amount of bandwidth.

“This disparity hinders the operators' ability to invest in network upgrades and expansion such as launch of 5G services in India – ultimately impacting service quality for consumers,” he said in the statement.

This also gives OTT players an unfair advantage as they make money from both end users and advertisers, while telcos mainly have the former as a revenue generator, he added.

Kochhar said further it’s unrealistic and unfair for OTT players to argue that telcos can simply raise end-user prices to make up the cost increase.

The COAI white paper is the latest salvo in a long-running debate between telcos and OTT players (not just in India but most of the world) about who should shoulder the cost of LTG traffic.

In India, the Broadband India Forum (BIF) – which represents Big Tech companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft – has long argued that it’s unfair for OTTs to pay for network rollouts when they have no say in how much telcos spend on spectrum and equipment. The BIF argues that telcos do earn money from all that extra traffic and if anything should be sharing that revenue with OTTs.

Acknowledging that this is not a new debate, Kochhar said the white paper intends to present a logical argument based on facts and statistics to make the case for requiring OTTs to share infrastructure costs.


Sign-up to our weekly newsletter

Keep up-to-date with all the latest news, articles, event and product updates posted on Developing Telecoms.
Subscribe to our FREE weekly email newsletters for the latest telecom info in developing and emerging markets globally.
Sending occasional e-mail from 3rd parties about industry white papers, online and live events relevant to subscribers helps us fund this website and free weekly newsletter. We never sell your personal data. Click here to view our privacy policy.